Anti-gun Ad Proves Need for Self Defense

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The latest Bloomberg anti-gun advertisement was meant to show why firearms need to be outlawed. The ad actually proves the need for owning a firearm for self protection!
The advertisement proves:
1. Despite the fact the perpetrator was banned from owning a firearm or ammunition due to a restraining order against him, he illegally possessed a firearm.  Outlawing firearms would not have stopped this.
2. The criminal was illegally carrying a concealed weapon.  Again laws against this behavior would not have stopped him.
3. The restraining order did not protect the woman.  It even appears to have acted as a catalyst for violence.
4. The police could not possibly arrive in time and thus were powerless to protect the woman.
5. The woman was shot to death because she had no form of self defense.
6. The only possible way for the woman to have survived was to protect herself with a firearm.
http://www.ammoland.com/2014/08/bloomberg-ad-inadvertently-portrays-limits-of-gun-control-agenda/#axzz39WkdYtRH

This entry was posted in Protection and Safety. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Anti-gun Ad Proves Need for Self Defense

  1. Loren says:

    You share interesting things here. I think
    that your blog can go viral easily, but you must give it initial boost and i know how to
    do it, just search in google for – wcnu traffic
    increase

Leave a Reply to Loren Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *